Table Of Contents :
ABOUT DATAMONITOR 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
INTRODUCTION 22
What is this report about? 22
Who is the target reader? 22
How to use this report 22
Definitions 22
GLOBAL MARINE FREIGHT 23
Market overview 23
Market value 24
Market segmentation I 25
Market segmentation II 26
Five forces analysis 27
MARINE FREIGHT IN ASIA-PACIFIC 35
Market overview 35
Market value 36
Market segmentation I 37
Market segmentation II 38
Five forces analysis 39
MARINE FREIGHT IN EUROPE 47
Market overview 47
Market value 48
Market segmentation I 49
Market segmentation II 50
Five forces analysis 51
MARINE FREIGHT IN FRANCE 59
Market overview 59
Market value 60
Market segmentation I 61
Market segmentation II 62
Five forces analysis 63
Macroeconomic indicators 71
MARINE FREIGHT IN GERMANY 73
Market overview 73
Market value 74
Market segmentation I 75
Market segmentation II 76
Five forces analysis 77
Macroeconomic indicators 85
MARINE FREIGHT IN ITALY 87
Market overview 87
Market value 88
Market segmentation I 89
Market segmentation II 90
Five forces analysis 91
Macroeconomic indicators 99
MARINE FREIGHT IN JAPAN 101
Market overview 101
Market value 102
Market segmentation I 103
Market segmentation II 104
Five forces analysis 105
Macroeconomic indicators 113
MARINE FREIGHT IN BELGIUM 115
Market overview 115
Market value 116
Market segmentation I 117
Market segmentation II 118
Five forces analysis 119
Macroeconomic indicators 127
MARINE FREIGHT IN CANADA 129
Market overview 129
Market value 130
Market segmentation I 131
Market segmentation II 132
Five forces analysis 133
Macroeconomic indicators 141
MARINE FREIGHT IN CHINA 143
Market overview 143
Market value 144
Market segmentation I 145
Market segmentation II 146
Five forces analysis 147
Macroeconomic indicators 155
MARINE FREIGHT IN THE NETHERLANDS 157
Market overview 157
Market value 158
Market segmentation I 159
Market segmentation II 160
Five forces analysis 161
Macroeconomic indicators 169
MARINE FREIGHT IN SPAIN 171
Market overview 171
Market value 172
Market segmentation I 173
Market segmentation II 174
Five forces analysis 175
Macroeconomic indicators 183
MARINE FREIGHT IN THE UNITED KINGDOM 185
Market overview 185
Market value 186
Market segmentation I 187
Market segmentation II 188
Five forces analysis 189
Macroeconomic indicators 197
MARINE FREIGHT IN THE UNITED STATES 199
Market overview 199
Market value 200
Market segmentation I 201
Market segmentation II 202
Five forces analysis 203
Macroeconomic indicators 211
Company profiles 213
A.P. Moller-Maersk Group 213
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha 219
Kuehne + Nagel International AG 224
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. 230
APPENDIX 235
Data Research Methodology 235
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Global marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 24
Table 2: Global marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 25
Table 3: Global marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 26
Table 4: Asia-Pacific marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 36
Table 5: Asia-Pacific marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 37
Table 6: Asia-Pacific marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 38
Table 7: Europe marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 48
Table 8: Europe marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 49
Table 9: Europe marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 50
Table 10: France marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 60
Table 11: France marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 61
Table 12: France marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 62
Table 13: France size of population (million), 2006–10 71
Table 14: France gdp (constant 2000 prices, $ billion), 2006–10 71
Table 15: France gdp (current prices, $ billion), 2006–10 71
Table 16: France inflation, 2006–10 72
Table 17: France consumer price index (absolute), 2006–10 72
Table 18: France exchange rate, 2006–10 72
Table 19: Germany marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 74
Table 20: Germany marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 75
Table 21: Germany marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 76
Table 22: Germany size of population (million), 2006–10 85
Table 23: Germany gdp (constant 2000 prices, $ billion), 2006–10 85
Table 24: Germany gdp (current prices, $ billion), 2006–10 85
Table 25: Germany inflation, 2006–10 86
Table 26: Germany consumer price index (absolute), 2006–10 86
Table 27: Germany exchange rate, 2006–10 86
Table 28: Italy marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 88
Table 29: Italy marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 89
Table 30: Italy marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 90
Table 31: Italy size of population (million), 2006–10 99
Table 32: Italy gdp (constant 2000 prices, $ billion), 2006–10 99
Table 33: Italy gdp (current prices, $ billion), 2006–10 99
Table 34: Italy inflation, 2006–10 100
Table 35: Italy consumer price index (absolute), 2006–10 100
Table 36: Italy exchange rate, 2006–10 100
Table 37: Japan marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 102
Table 38: Japan marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 103
Table 39: Japan marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 104
Table 40: Japan size of population (million), 2006–10 113
Table 41: Japan gdp (constant 2000 prices, $ billion), 2006–10 113
Table 42: Japan gdp (current prices, $ billion), 2006–10 113
Table 43: Japan inflation, 2006–10 114
Table 44: Japan consumer price index (absolute), 2006–10 114
Table 45: Japan exchange rate, 2006–10 114
Table 46: Belgium marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 116
Table 47: Belgium marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 117
Table 48: Belgium marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 118
Table 49: Belgium size of population (million), 2006–10 127
Table 50: Belgium gdp (constant 2000 prices, $ billion), 2006–10 127
Table 51: Belgium gdp (current prices, $ billion), 2006–10 127
Table 52: Belgium inflation, 2006–10 128
Table 53: Belgium consumer price index (absolute), 2006–10 128
Table 54: Belgium exchange rate, 2006–10 128
Table 55: Canada marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 130
Table 56: Canada marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 131
Table 57: Canada marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 132
Table 58: Canada size of population (million), 2006–10 141
Table 59: Canada gdp (constant 2000 prices, $ billion), 2006–10 141
Table 60: Canada gdp (current prices, $ billion), 2006–10 141
Table 61: Canada inflation, 2006–10 142
Table 62: Canada consumer price index (absolute), 2006–10 142
Table 63: Canada exchange rate, 2006–10 142
Table 64: China marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 144
Table 65: China marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 145
Table 66: China marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 146
Table 67: China size of population (million), 2006–10 155
Table 68: China gdp (constant 2000 prices, $ billion), 2006–10 155
Table 69: China gdp (current prices, $ billion), 2006–10 155
Table 70: China inflation, 2006–10 156
Table 71: China consumer price index (absolute), 2006–10 156
Table 72: China exchange rate, 2006–10 156
Table 73: Netherlands marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 158
Table 74: Netherlands marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 159
Table 75: Netherlands marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 160
Table 76: Netherlands size of population (million), 2006–10 169
Table 77: Netherlands gdp (constant 2000 prices, $ billion), 2006–10 169
Table 78: Netherlands gdp (current prices, $ billion), 2006–10 169
Table 79: Netherlands inflation, 2006–10 170
Table 80: Netherlands consumer price index (absolute), 2006–10 170
Table 81: Netherlands exchange rate, 2006–10 170
Table 82: Spain marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 172
Table 83: Spain marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 173
Table 84: Spain marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 174
Table 85: Spain size of population (million), 2006–10 183
Table 86: Spain gdp (constant 2000 prices, $ billion), 2006–10 183
Table 87: Spain gdp (current prices, $ billion), 2006–10 183
Table 88: Spain inflation, 2006–10 184
Table 89: Spain consumer price index (absolute), 2006–10 184
Table 90: Spain exchange rate, 2006–10 184
Table 91: United Kingdom marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 186
Table 92: United Kingdom marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 187
Table 93: United Kingdom marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 188
Table 94: United Kingdom size of population (million), 2006–10 197
Table 95: United Kingdom gdp (constant 2000 prices, $ billion), 2006–10 197
Table 96: United Kingdom gdp (current prices, $ billion), 2006–10 197
Table 97: United Kingdom inflation, 2006–10 198
Table 98: United Kingdom consumer price index (absolute), 2006–10 198
Table 99: United Kingdom exchange rate, 2006–10 198
Table 100: United States marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 200
Table 101: United States marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 201
Table 102: United States marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 202
Table 103: United States size of population (million), 2006–10 211
Table 104: United States gdp (constant 2000 prices, $ billion), 2006–10 211
Table 105: United States gdp (current prices, $ billion), 2006–10 211
Table 106: United States inflation, 2006–10 212
Table 107: United States consumer price index (absolute), 2006–10 212
Table 108: United States exchange rate, 2006–10 212
Table 109: A.P. Moller-Maersk Group: key facts 213
Table 110: A.P. Moller-Maersk Group: key financials ($) 216
Table 111: A.P. Moller-Maersk Group: key financials (DKK) 216
Table 112: A.P. Moller-Maersk Group: key financial ratios 217
Table 113: Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha: key facts 219
Table 114: Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha: key financials ($) 221
Table 115: Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha: key financials (¥) 221
Table 116: Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha: key financial ratios 222
Table 117: Kuehne + Nagel International AG: key facts 224
Table 118: Kuehne + Nagel International AG: key financials ($) 227
Table 119: Kuehne + Nagel International AG: key financials ($) 227
Table 120: Kuehne + Nagel International AG: key financial ratios 227
Table 121: Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.: key facts 230
Table 122: Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.: key financials ($) 232
Table 123: Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.: key financials (¥) 232
Table 124: Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.: key financial ratios 232
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Global marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 24
Figure 2: Global marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 25
Figure 3: Global marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 26
Figure 4: Forces driving competition in the global marine freight industry, 2010 27
Figure 5: Drivers of buyer power in the global marine freight industry, 2010 29
Figure 6: Drivers of supplier power in the global marine freight industry, 2010 30
Figure 7: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the global marine freight industry, 2010 31
Figure 8: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the global marine freight industry, 2010 33
Figure 9: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the global marine freight industry, 2010 34
Figure 10: Asia-Pacific marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 36
Figure 11: Asia-Pacific marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 37
Figure 12: Asia-Pacific marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 38
Figure 13: Forces driving competition in the marine freight industry in Asia-Pacific, 2010 39
Figure 14: Drivers of buyer power in the marine freight industry in Asia-Pacific, 2010 41
Figure 15: Drivers of supplier power in the marine freight industry in Asia-Pacific, 2010 42
Figure 16: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the marine freight industry in Asia-Pacific, 2010 43
Figure 17: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the marine freight industry in Asia-Pacific, 2010 45
Figure 18: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the marine freight industry in Asia-Pacific, 2010 46
Figure 19: Europe marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 48
Figure 20: Europe marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 49
Figure 21: Europe marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 50
Figure 22: Forces driving competition in the marine freight industry in Europe, 2010 51
Figure 23: Drivers of buyer power in the marine freight industry in Europe, 2010 53
Figure 24: Drivers of supplier power in the marine freight industry in Europe, 2010 54
Figure 25: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the marine freight industry in Europe, 2010 55
Figure 26: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the marine freight industry in Europe, 2010 57
Figure 27: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the marine freight industry in Europe, 2010 58
Figure 28: France marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 60
Figure 29: France marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 61
Figure 30: France marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 62
Figure 31: Forces driving competition in the marine freight industry in France, 2010 63
Figure 32: Drivers of buyer power in the marine freight industry in France, 2010 65
Figure 33: Drivers of supplier power in the marine freight industry in France, 2010 66
Figure 34: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the marine freight industry in France, 2010 67
Figure 35: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the marine freight industry in France, 2010 69
Figure 36: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the marine freight industry in France, 2010 70
Figure 37: Germany marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 74
Figure 38: Germany marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 75
Figure 39: Germany marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 76
Figure 40: Forces driving competition in the marine freight industry in Germany, 2010 77
Figure 41: Drivers of buyer power in the marine freight industry in Germany, 2010 79
Figure 42: Drivers of supplier power in the marine freight industry in Germany, 2010 80
Figure 43: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the marine freight industry in Germany, 2010 81
Figure 44: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the marine freight industry in Germany, 2010 83
Figure 45: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the marine freight industry in Germany, 2010 84
Figure 46: Italy marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 88
Figure 47: Italy marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 89
Figure 48: Italy marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 90
Figure 49: Forces driving competition in the marine freight industry in Italy, 2010 91
Figure 50: Drivers of buyer power in the marine freight industry in Italy, 2010 93
Figure 51: Drivers of supplier power in the marine freight industry in Italy, 2010 94
Figure 52: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the marine freight industry in Italy, 2010 95
Figure 53: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the marine freight industry in Italy, 2010 97
Figure 54: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the marine freight industry in Italy, 2010 98
Figure 55: Japan marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 102
Figure 56: Japan marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 103
Figure 57: Japan marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 104
Figure 58: Forces driving competition in the marine freight industry in Japan, 2010 105
Figure 59: Drivers of buyer power in the marine freight industry in Japan, 2010 107
Figure 60: Drivers of supplier power in the marine freight industry in Japan, 2010 108
Figure 61: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the marine freight industry in Japan, 2010 109
Figure 62: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the marine freight industry in Japan, 2010 111
Figure 63: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the marine freight industry in Japan, 2010 112
Figure 64: Belgium marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 116
Figure 65: Belgium marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 117
Figure 66: Belgium marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 118
Figure 67: Forces driving competition in the marine freight industry in Belgium, 2010 119
Figure 68: Drivers of buyer power in the marine freight industry in Belgium, 2010 121
Figure 69: Drivers of supplier power in the marine freight industry in Belgium, 2010 122
Figure 70: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the marine freight industry in Belgium, 2010 123
Figure 71: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the marine freight industry in Belgium, 2010 125
Figure 72: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the marine freight industry in Belgium, 2010 126
Figure 73: Canada marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 130
Figure 74: Canada marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 131
Figure 75: Canada marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 132
Figure 76: Forces driving competition in the marine freight industry in Canada, 2010 133
Figure 77: Drivers of buyer power in the marine freight industry in Canada, 2010 135
Figure 78: Drivers of supplier power in the marine freight industry in Canada, 2010 136
Figure 79: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the marine freight industry in Canada, 2010 137
Figure 80: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the marine freight industry in Canada, 2010 139
Figure 81: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the marine freight industry in Canada, 2010 140
Figure 82: China marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 144
Figure 83: China marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 145
Figure 84: China marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 146
Figure 85: Forces driving competition in the marine freight industry in China, 2010 147
Figure 86: Drivers of buyer power in the marine freight industry in China, 2010 149
Figure 87: Drivers of supplier power in the marine freight industry in China, 2010 150
Figure 88: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the marine freight industry in China, 2010 151
Figure 89: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the marine freight industry in China, 2010 153
Figure 90: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the marine freight industry in China, 2010 154
Figure 91: Netherlands marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 158
Figure 92: Netherlands marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 159
Figure 93: Netherlands marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 160
Figure 94: Forces driving competition in the marine freight industry in the Netherlands, 2010 161
Figure 95: Drivers of buyer power in the marine freight industry in the Netherlands, 2010 163
Figure 96: Drivers of supplier power in the marine freight industry in the Netherlands, 2010 164
Figure 97: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the marine freight industry in the Netherlands, 2010 165
Figure 98: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the marine freight industry in the Netherlands, 2010 167
Figure 99: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the marine freight industry in the Netherlands, 2010 168
Figure 100: Spain marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 172
Figure 101: Spain marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 173
Figure 102: Spain marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 174
Figure 103: Forces driving competition in the marine freight industry in Spain, 2010 175
Figure 104: Drivers of buyer power in the marine freight industry in Spain, 2010 177
Figure 105: Drivers of supplier power in the marine freight industry in Spain, 2010 178
Figure 106: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the marine freight industry in Spain, 2010 179
Figure 107: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the marine freight industry in Spain, 2010 181
Figure 108: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the marine freight industry in Spain, 2010 182
Figure 109: United Kingdom marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 186
Figure 110: United Kingdom marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 187
Figure 111: United Kingdom marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 188
Figure 112: Forces driving competition in the marine freight industry in the United Kingdom, 2010 189
Figure 113: Drivers of buyer power in the marine freight industry in the United Kingdom, 2010 191
Figure 114: Drivers of supplier power in the marine freight industry in the United Kingdom, 2010 192
Figure 115: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the marine freight industry in the United Kingdom, 2010 193
Figure 116: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the marine freight industry in the United Kingdom, 2010 195
Figure 117: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the marine freight industry in the United Kingdom, 2010 196
Figure 118: United States marine freight industry value: $ billion, 2006–10 200
Figure 119: United States marine freight industry segmentation I:% share, by value, 2010 201
Figure 120: United States marine freight industry segmentation II: % share, by value, 2010 202
Figure 121: Forces driving competition in the marine freight industry in the United States, 2010 203
Figure 122: Drivers of buyer power in the marine freight industry in the United States, 2010 205
Figure 123: Drivers of supplier power in the marine freight industry in the United States, 2010 206
Figure 124: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the marine freight industry in the United States, 2010 207
Figure 125: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the marine freight industry in the United States, 2010 209
Figure 126: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the marine freight industry in the United States, 2010 210
Figure 127: A.P. Moller-Maersk Group: revenues & profitability 217
Figure 128: A.P. Moller-Maersk Group: assets & liabilities 218
Figure 129: Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha: revenues & profitability 222
Figure 130: Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha: assets & liabilities 223
Figure 131: Kuehne + Nagel International AG: revenues & profitability 228
Figure 132: Kuehne + Nagel International AG: assets & liabilities 229
Figure 133: Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.: revenues & profitability 233
Figure 134: Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.: assets & liabilities 234
|
