Table Of Contents :
1 Introduction
1.1 Why a study on success rates of biotech companies?
1.2 What are success rates?
1.3 The role of success rates
1.4 Are success rates of biotech companies different?
2 Methods
2.1 Origin of Data
2.2 Difference between FDA and EMEA
2.3 Time frame
2.4 Success rates per molecule vs. success rates per indication
2.5 Companies of the sample
3 Results
3.1 Reporting of success and failure
3.2 Distribution of sample over disease groups
3.3 Overall biotech success rates (IND to approval)
3.4 Disease group specific overall success rates (IND to approval)
3.5 Number of projects in different disease groups
3.6 Disease group specific Success Rates
3.6.1 Cancer (471 projects)
3.6.2 Neurology (157 projects)
3.6.3 Infectious (56 projects)
3.6.4 Inflammation (127 projects)
3.6.5 Cardiovascular (85 projects)
3.6.6 Pain management (75 projects)
3.6.7 Dermatology (31 projects)
3.6.8 Endocrinology (27 projects)
3.6.9 Metabolic (66 projects)
3.6.10 Genitourinary (38 projects)
3.6.11 Hematology (28 projects)
3.6.12 Gastrointestinal (28 projects)
4 Discussion
4.1 Success Rates in Biotech (Avance) and Pharma (Kola, Landis)
4.2 Difference in cancer
4.3 Difference in Neurology
4.4 Difference in Infectious Diseases
4.5 Difference in Inflammation
4.6 Difference in Cardiovascula
4.7 Biotech has more late stage failures
4.8 Case Study: Arpida
4.9 Biotech does not abandon low potential drugs
5 Conclusion
|